To Buy or to Rent, That is the Question…

by Victor Normand

There are many considerations when trying to decide whether to buy or rent a home and there is no right answer that will suit everyone.  This blog will deal only with the economics of the decision using a realistic set of assumptions and current market conditions.  It’s a good place to start and allows for other life circumstances to inform the final decision.  Just under 65% of Americans are homeowners and a majority of those who do not own homes would like to some day, according to the National Association of Home Builders. It’s still a big part of the American Dream.

In order to conduct the analysis, a standard model was used to compare both the short term and long term costs and benefits of both owning and renting.  The specific numbers used to populate the model come from  recent sales and rentals as published in the local multiple listing service (MLS PIN). A time period of five years was chosen as the length of occupany for both the renter and the buyer. The metrics used for both the sold and rented units were:

We found 23 sales and 25 rentals that met these criteria.  The median sale price was $185,000 and the median rent was $1,550. The simple average was $177,661 and $1,541 respectively  The median was used because there are as many sales below that number as above, so extremes do not effect the selected values.For the rental units, we assumed rental insurance of $240 per year and annual rent increases of 4% which seems to be the market for two bedroom units.

For the sold units, we assumed 5% downpayment, a 30 year mortgage interest rate of 5.0 (FHA),closing costs of $6,000, property taxes of $2,123 annually, condominium fee of $393 per month, mortgage insurance at .5% of the mortage amount, and condominium unit owners insurance of $240 annually.  Property taxes and condominium fees were also increased by 4% annually to be consistent with rent increases.

Based on these criteria, the total monthly cost to buy was $1,607 and the monthly cost to rent was $1,570.  Over a five year period of ownership, the cash paid out for the buyer would be $97,879 vs. $101,944 for the renter. So, if you are paying more than $1550 per month and you can find a nice condominium for anything less than $185,000, buying is your best economic option.

There are two real sweetners for the buy option.  Assuming a combined state and federal tax rate of 20%, a five year tax benefit of $10,752 would be realized by the homeowner.  Additionally, the homeowner would have paid down the mortgage loan by $14,361 and can expect the property to have appreciated in value by $40,081 over that time period.

As they say in investing, past performance is not necessarily an indicator of future returns.   The same holds true for real estate investing, including the purchase of a primary residence.  But unlike stocks and bonds, it’s easier to ride out the slow or down years simply because you need to have someplace to live.

So, if you’re secure in your job, have managed to save for a down payment and have a good credit score,(680 or above) a closer look at some available real estate may make sense at this time.  And as always, while formulas and rules of thumb are a good place to start, get a professional like a Resident Expertsm  to work closely with you on this journey.

Beware the Bubble

By: Victor Normand

My daughter Emily recently returned from a trip to Europe with a gift for her dad. It sits in front of me now as I write. A small brown paper bag with little holes punched on two sides so that the tulip bulbs inside can breathe, I assume they need to breathe. If this present of tulip bulbs and its long ago circumstances were described in a novel, its significance would eventually be revealed. Students of economic history may already have an idea of its place in this story.

Housing and real estate news have regularly of late, contained articles speculating on the growing signs of another housing bubble, especially in some red-hot markets. Not far from Acton, many communities closer to Boston and in Boston itself are seeing behaviors characteristic of a bubble in the making. Multiple and over-asking offers on homes are occurring with predictability, causing asking prices to rise ever higher.

The term” Bubble” dates back centuries and economic bubbles were occurring even before we had such a name for them. The term bubble derives from the prices paid for stocks that were inflated and expanded by nothing but air and are vulnerable to burst suddenly. Investors were most prone to be the victims of bursting bubbles though recent history has shown that ordinary home owners can get caught as well.

Bubbles form when the price of an asset, like a home, deviates substantially from its intrinsic value. Unfortunately, the intrinsic value is more often not revealed until after the bubble has burst. Most economists believe that bursting bubbles are a recurring feature of our modern economy. Models used to predict periods of irrational pricing rely on analyzing the expected stream of income or dividends, which is no help to buyers of single family homes.

The maddening aspect of bubble formation is that they present profit opportunities for investors who are in early and most importantly, out before the bubble bursts. These Ponzi scheme participants manage to find a chair before the music stops.

The key element for home buyers who are in the market during times of hyper price escalation is to expect a bubble. However, if the target property is in the right location, fits the buyers needs and desires and most importantly, occupancy is expected for an extended period of time, it’s right to make the buy. Home equity lost during the Great Recession of 2008-2009 has returned to most markets across the country. And here at Acton Real Estate, our “Resident Experts” have had lots of experience in all markets and can help you make those decisions.

As for the tulip bulbs Emily brought back from the Netherlands, in the Fall I will be planting them and thinking about how investors were paying a small fortune, as much as 5,500 guilders for a single bulb! That was enough to buy a small house in Amsterdam at the time. Tulip Mania of 1636-1637 is often said to be the first true economic bubble in history. As for my bulbs, I have assessed their intrinsic value based on having a loving memory of my daughter’s thoughtfulness.  Having said that, 5,500 guilders IS a lot of money!

Disruptive Innovation

By: Victor Normand

As I write this it is easy for me to imagine that countless technology innovators around the globe are hard at work crafting apps and programs to basically accomplish everything. If you name a product or service, you can be sure someone is out there trying to be successful doing it better, cheaper or faster.

In business it is called disruptive innovation and it really isn’t a new concept.  Think stone tools, fire or the wheel to begin with, everything that creates new value that replaces an existing good or service is disruptive, and that’s a good thing usually, in the long run. Not all innovation works out as intended, for example the dirigible had its draw backs. Things that are costly and widely used attract the most attention from innovators, like real estate brokerage.

Internet technology has opened the innovation door wide and has caused whole industries to change dramatically in an ever accelerating fashion. A friend from college thought she had an enduring career in travel and another of my friends once owned a bookstore. Uber now accounts for 40% of all business travel in 108 countries and Airbnb is giving the hotel industry heartburn. But for many reasons, the disruptive innovators have not been able to break the back of the real estate brokerage.

About 90% of all home sales still involve real estate brokers and that percentage has actually increased over the past 20 years. And a significant percentage of the balance, are transactions between close friends and family members. While technology has changed the industry, the traditional commission based model remains in place despite many well funded attempts to change the way residential real estate is bought and sold.

One west coast based real estate technology company that once thought the buying and selling of homes could be transacted almost entirely on line and has operated in markets across the country, never made money and burned through over $600 million in venture capital. They’ve effectively become a discount brokerage, a business model that has never been successful.

Residential real estate is not a commodity. If it were, Amazon would have figured out how to retail it. Actually, Amazon is beginning to offer referral services like Google and Facebook, recognizing the important role of the real estate professional in the buying and selling process; a role that has become increasingly more complicated as more and more information about properties and markets becomes available. To a great extent, the internet has made buyers and sellers more aware of how complicated a real estate transaction can become.

The real estate commission remains the big prize for disruptive innovators. But eliminating the commission expense from the sale of a home does not necessarily mean the actual sale price does not change. Since almost every home sale involves a commission, the commission is in fact baked into the sale price of all homes. Unless a brokerage is buying sales volume by operating at a loss, which always ends unhappily for that brokerage, commissions offered will reflect the effort required to provide service.

Someday a machine will write blogs like this and be read by a generation born into the world of artificial intelligence, until then the debate rages on.

The White House

By: Victor Normand

I have been thinking a lot about the White House lately and thought I should write a blog about it, so here it is. George Washington never lived there, the only President (the title he chose for himself over king), who did not, though the responsibility for its creation fell to him completely. Once the Constitution was adopted in 1788 and the first election of a leader was completed, it seems most of the Founding Fathers vacated the scene. As expected, and hoped for, George Washington won the election with all 69 of the electoral votes cast. He had done great things for the new country, and was about to add first time home buyer for the nation to his list of accomplishments. The task of finding the right location in the right part of the country and building a suitable home for its leader fell to him.

In 1789, no country on earth was ruled by someone who was term limited and George Washington was determined that the United States of America was to be the first. And that was not the only egalitarian distinction he was going to bring to his new charge. While he felt strongly that the President should reside in a substantial residence, he rejected city planner L’Enfant’s vision for a grand elaborate palace and settled on a house one third as large, yet grand for its time in America. Bigger homes would not be built until after the Civil War during the Gilded Age.

Capital cities in Europe were recognized for the wealth and commerce they attracted so it was not surprising that New York and Philadelphia, Americas two largest cities, competed for the chance to become the nation’s capital and home to the President, but Washington felt that it was important to locate the seat of government and the “Executive Mansion” in a more central location. He signed legislation in 1790, designating land not more than 10 miles square along the Potomac River at the Maryland/Virginia border to be the Federal City. Washington personally selected the “practical and handsome” design by James Hoban from among nine competing submissions. The cornerstone was laid in October of 1792 and Washington was present to oversee the construction of the house. He would not live to see his vision realized when the house was completed in 1800.

The White House is 185 feet long, 85 feet wide with two basements and four stories above grade for a total of 55,000 square feet of living area. It has had its share of challenges requiring upgrades including being set afire by the British in 1814, a major house fire during the Hoover administration in 1929, and near structural failure when Truman was President. The nation has never failed to respond to the needs of the White House, which only became the White House in 1901 when Theodore Roosevelt began using the nickname on his engraved stationary.

The White House cost about $3 million in today’s dollars. It was a great expense for the new nation, but Washington knew how important it was to show confidence to the world that our democracy would endure. No matter what your politics are, it is hard not to be anxious these days, but we can take some comfort in the permanence and beauty of this old house.

Student Loan (IBR) and Mortgage Qualification

Last month we discussed the very large problem of ever increasing student debt and its effects on first time home buyers. It’s clear that something needs to be done to bring higher education costs down and at the same time introduce some form of underwriting into the process of qualifying for a student loan. While there are differences between the sub-prime lending crisis and a student debt crisis, there are dangerous similarities as well.

In the meantime, there are many individuals and families who would otherwise be active in the housing marketplace but for the need to manage student debt. For good or bad, the debt is there and often perceived as an insurmountable barrier to home ownership. But there are options for those willing to seek them out.

For some, paying off college loans is paramount, and delaying home ownership and even marriage and starting a family will just have to wait. But the standard term of college loans, (10 years) is a long time to wait before the debt to income (DTI) ratios will be good enough to allow for a mortgage. Then there is the matter of a down payment and how that happens when there is no discretionary income.

The alternative for many with student debt is Income Based Repayment (IBR). This option is available to those with federal student loans, which is more than 75% of the $1.4 trillion in outstanding loans. These programs extend the repayment period for qualified borrowers to as long as 25 years. As you can imagine, the amount of interest paid under these programs relative to the original debt is substantial.

Qualifying for these programs involves calculating “discretionary income” which is the difference between adjusted gross income and 150% of the annual poverty line based on family size. Depending on when the loans were taken out, monthly payments are either 10% or 15% of that amount. A recent graduate with $60,000 of student debt who earns $40,000 annually could see their monthly payment decreased from $650 to as low as $180. There are many variables associated with IBR programs, but such decreases are not uncommon.

With discipline, someone taking advantage of an IBR could accumulate the cash needed for a down payment on a modest house or condominium. Making payments on time under an IBR program should reflect just as well on a credit score as payments under the original repayment plan. Loan underwriters and some of the Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSE’s) however do not look favorably on IBR plans.

Presently, some conventional lenders, FHA and USDA programs consider an IBR a temporary deferral and require underwriting to use the original loan terms or 1% of the loan balance, whichever is lower, to qualify a borrower. All IBR programs require annual re-certification, but they remain in place for as long as discretional income remains low and the borrower wants to participate. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will use IBR plans to meet their loan standards.

An added feature to some IBR programs is loan forgiveness. A graduate with high debt who is employed in a low paying profession, will have any balance remaining on their debt, forgiven at the end of the 20 or 25-year term. This may have tax consequences for the borrower, but it is something to consider. Of course, higher incomes than expected can always be used to pay down or pay off student loan debt at any time. And with home ownership, comes opportunities to use accumulated equity to pay down debt at lower rates of interest and greater tax deductibility options than student loan debt.

In conclusion, if those with student debt have a tolerance for making very high interest payments, especially during the early years of repayment, are willing to spend the time to learn more about the benefits and drawbacks of the IBR program and inclined to seek out a lender familiar with IBR, home ownership might just happen.

Area High Schools to Offer Associates Degrees?

Now that I have your attention, you should know that this blog is about first time home buyers, or to be more specific, the lack thereof, caused in part by student loan debt. The national rate of home ownership is at a 50 year low, partly as a result of a housing market still not fully recovered from the sub-prime mortgage crisis and ensuing recession, but also because buyers in their 20’s and 30’s are not entering the market as they have done in the past. We know those buyers as millennials.

Seventy percent of those 54 million millennials in the workforce have student loan debt and that debt, $1.3 trillion in total, an amount greater than any other type of consumer debt other than home mortgages, is making it very hard to save for a down payment and support a mortgage. According to a survey of borrowers done by American Student Assistance (ASA) done in 2015, 1 in 5 millennials reported postponing marriage and more than half said their student loans were delaying the decision to buy a home.

Residential real estate is a significant contributor to our economy. The economic impacts resulting from this dearth of first time buyers are widespread, everything from construction spending to the purchase of home furnishings is affected as is the ability of existing homeowners to find buyers so that they can move up or out of their homes. But the more frightening aspect of this situation, a crisis in the making, is that the trend shows no signs of abating as demonstrated in the above graph.

Borrowing has gone up for two reasons, the high cost of a college education and the ease with which money can be borrowed to fund those increases. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, between 1980 and 2014, the price of a college education increased by 260% while the Consumer Price Index for all consumers only increased by 120%. We need to deal with both issues.

As our economy has changed from manufacturing to service/intellectually oriented, so has the demand for a more highly educated and specialized workforce. Why not recognize this need within the context of our local public education system? Why not add grades 13 and 14 to high schools and have those two grades accredited as associate degrees? Many high schools now offer college level courses so crafting a full curriculum leading to an associate’s degree is not unrealistic. There could be many other advantages to this scheme, not the least of which is a better utilization of our school buildings.

The underwriting of student loans however, may be the real problem that needs to be addressed. Consider a lending environment where borrower income is not considered, nor are borrower assets, nor the underlying value of what borrowed funds would be used for. Consider if this were how home mortgage loans were made, actually, there was a time not that long ago when that was exactly how some home loans were made and we all know how that turned out!

Not the Oldest Profession

Rudyard Kipling began the following discussion of professionalism when he wrote a story in 1888 and spoke of a woman named Lalun as belonging to the most ancient profession in the world. Notwithstanding Rudyard’s declaration, Medieval and early modern regard for the professions was short listed to include only Divinity, Medicine and Law. Over time, occupations ranging from Accountants to Librarians were added to the list and the likes of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln can be credited with adding surveying, which they all did, to the ranks of professionals.

Early real estate agents did not enjoy much respect. Brokering the sale of Manhattan Island to Dutch developers for $26 did not help with public opinion. In 1908, the National Association of Real Estate Exchanges, predecessor organization of the National Association of Realtors, was founded in an attempt to raise the status of the occupation so that mothers of lawyers could feel that their other son (or daughter) was just as important.

As time passed, more and more states required that real estate agents be licensed and trained, though the educational requirement has never risen above the high school level anywhere. Work performed by real estate agents has become more complicated as home ownership increased from only 25% in 1900 to close to 70% today. Still, many regarded the work of agents “as a job”…. like holding the first “Open House” at Levittown in 1947, and not a profession.

Most committed real estate agents strive to be regarded as respected professionals who earn their compensation for what they know and have experienced, as much as for what they “do.” Also, because of ever increasing regulations at all levels of government accompanied by significantly more sophisticated internet enabled consumers, the days of the part time real estate agent are coming to an end as specialization becomes the norm.

The internet and associated technology have had many effects on the real estate profession. The quantity and availability of information has empowered consumers to a degree unimagined even a decade ago. And technology companies have been aggressively trying to disrupt the old agent/consumer model by developing agent eliminating algorithms that aggregate large amounts of information for consumers to buy and sell on their own.

So far that has not worked nearly as well as the internet technology being used to disrupt retail (Amazon), hospitality (Airbnb) and transportation (Uber). While Millennials and Gen X’ers spend inordinate amounts of time on the internet, according to Inman News, 90% of them still eventually use a real estate agent to do their deals. This practice clearly goes to the heart of the job versus professional distinction where the real estate agent is valued for their ability to dissect information and apply their local market insights to transactions.

Finally, internet technologies have given everyone, including real estate agents, the ability to market themselves extensively.  I recently interviewed a millennial couple who were as interested in learning as much about individual agents using social media platforms as they were about all of the details available conducting their property searches.  In 1888, one would need to completely rely on Rudyard Kipling to learn everything about Lulan. Today she would most certainly have her own Facebook page and Instagram account and of course, one could always Google her.

Decisions, Decisions, Decisions

Buying or selling a home is a big decision for most of us. Some people labor over the decision, some not so much. As an objective observer and professional real estate Agent hired to assist in either process, this path to the end is often a long and winding road and can at times, defy logical explanation.

You would like to think that there always exists a set of rational facts that when gathered together and organized properly, lead to a logical conclusion. This should hold true whether you are making the decision or helping someone else through the decision making process. It is not always easy to gather those facts. Finding a sufficient body of knowledge surrounding any given decision is not so easy but nonetheless, we all believe that those relevant pieces of information exist.

As we move forward in the process, we often come across the eureka moment when we are sure of the right decision. Suddenly, all is clear and apparent so time to move forward, right? Or have our emotions interfered with the thought process and are we about to make an irrational choice?

Is it possible to strip away emotion so we can know what is TRULY the right thing to do? Is there someone out there, some clear thinking real estate agent strong enough to tell us if we are in fact making the wrong decision because of our emotional state?

If you struggle to strip away emotion from the process, you are likely to be struggling for a long time and not getting any closer to knowing the right course of action. Emotions by definition, are powerful feelings that existed in the human brain BEFORE the ability to reason came along. Scientists have observed that reason and emotion are linked in human behavior and now believe that both functions don’t just co-exist but rather are a singular process.

Neuroscientists studying brain chemistry have found that the decision making process requires both reason and emotion to work. Now you know for certain that Dr. Spock is not of this planet……if you ever doubted that. Neuroscientist Antonio Damasio writes about a patient who underwent brain surgery to remove a tumor and lost the orbital frontal cortex which connects the rational frontal lobes with the emotional or limbic system and as a result, lost the ability to make decisions.

There is no sense trying to remove emotion from the decision making process, nor should we try less we unleash dire consequences. For clients and real estate agents alike, it’s important to recognize that the decision to buy or sell a home requires both a reasoned and emotional commitment. Even though life’s circumstance may point to a change in the size or location of a residence, it may be necessary to wait for the emotion connected to the change to catch up.

As professional real estate Agents, we commit ourselves to observing and listening to the needs and wants of clients. That process needs to include using emotional intelligence: the ability to identify and manage ones own emotions and the emotions of others. It may sound complicated, but it is after all, how we have evolved.

The Very High Cost of Housing Regulation

By: Victor Normand

We count on government to do many things like keeping us safe, protecting the environment and making sure the economy is run well. Our elected officials pass laws for the common good, then hand them over to bureaucrats who write the regulations to make the laws work. Every law in its implementation has a cost, though not always apparent for an individual regulation and eventually, those costs add up.

The National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) did add up those costs last year and determined that the cost of regulation at all levels of government accounted for almost 25% of the cost of a new home nationally. The breakdown is 14.6% of the final price to produce a finished lot and 9.7% for meeting requirements associated with actually building the house. Separately, in a 2015 study by the Pacific Research Institute, Massachusetts ranked 34th for its regulatory burden on small businesses; one being the least burdensome. So, it is safe to assume that regulation adds even more to the cost of new housing locally.

Here’s how the regulatory percentages translate into the actual cost of a new home sold in Acton in 2016:

Who can say whether all of the regulation is truly needed, but it seems that the cost benefit may not be present here. In the 1960’s, highway deaths averaged around 50,000 each year. Regulations requiring seat belts, air bags and other safety features have resulted in today’s average of around 30,000 deaths each year, one third of which are attributable to speeding. So, we could regulate speeds, not to exceed 5 or 10 miles per hour everywhere and possibly save lives, but how reasonable is it to think that we can make the world safe for everyone all the time?

And then there are regulations that are patently ridiculous. On the commercial real estate side, our new office is about 1,700 square feet. It is open concept with glass walls and doors, yet required to have no fewer than 8 fire alarm/strobe devices, any one of which could be heard or seen from anywhere in the office.

Compliance is another issue. The cost or effort to comply with building regulations places a disadvantage on smaller home construction businesses that are forced to hire outside consultants to fully comply with regulations. Most home contractors employ fewer than 10 workers and build fewer than 10 houses per year. Larger companies have compliance personnel on staff.

Because compliance is universal, the cost to comply is passed on to the consumer. This applies to renters as well because multi-family construction is impacted even more than single family housing, making the cost burden disproportionately greater on lower income individuals and households, as well as first time buyers.

So, what’s to be done? In addition to the NAHB, state and national housing associations and other trade associations do monitor new legislation and raise their voices, urging reasonable responses to safety and environmental threats. Individuals as well should make their opinions known.

It is important to make our homes safe, build them in appropriate locations, and keep their energy consumption efficient. But there are reasonable, cost effective limits to what should be required from new laws, and reviewing outdated laws and regulation is not a bad idea either. Let’s not get to the point where only the wealthy can afford new homes that are built by only the biggest home builders.

Wisdom from a Petting Zoo for the Holidays

By: Victor Normand

The merchants and businesses in West Acton Village held their annual Holiday Stroll recently to the delight of children and adults alike. There was music in the air, decorations everywhere, a scavenger hunt and a charity gift basket raffle. And of course, Santa and Mrs. Claus made a special appearance. Smiles were evident wherever you looked.

The strollers were treated to cookies and hot chocolate as they went from shop to shop, including a special holiday market opened just for the event. A small forest of decorated Christmas trees was set up at Villageworks where Santa and the Mrs. held court.

There were also animals present for the celebration, including a beautiful horse drawn carriage offering rides around the village and a little petting zoo for youngsters and us older folk with sheep and goats, a llama and a donkey. It was the donkey that made my day.  Unlike my cockapoo Edward, this donkey genuinely appreciated being petted. He just stood there motionless for as long as I was touching him. The other small animals roamed about in the enclosed area, but not my new four-legged friend. I truly felt a connection.

donkey

It was a connection that belonged to the season. My first thought in response to the undivided attention I was receiving went to imagining that this poor fellow, despite his involvement with a petting zoo, did not regularly get paid much attention, that after the day’s gig, he would be heading back to his lonely stall in a lonely barn on a lonely farm. In reality, I’m sure this creature has as happy a life as any donkey can expect to have and that he is treated very well.

By now I am feeling guilty that it took this unintended little act of kindness on my part toward this docile creature to make me realize that there are human beings in my world who could use little random acts of kindness as well.

We had a drop off station in the office for donations of food items for the Acton Food Pantry and families in need were the beneficiaries of the gift basket raffle. And in general, many of the organizations we support, pay special attention to the needy at this time of year, but the need for a gentle touch may often be much closer to home.

We should all be on the lookout for those around us, family, friends, co-workers who might be unhappy especially at this time of year when happiness might seem to be happening to everyone except them. Take a chance, show some love and kindness to everyone you come in contact with, you just might be surprised by how long they stay around for your touch.